·Dashboard·Research·Work·Archive
/

Indonesia — Enabling-Environment Gaps for GTP Sectors

The enabling-environment gaps for Indonesia's industrial-decarbonization push — EE enforcement, ESCO market, MRV, de-risking — and the government action that closes each.

GGGI · Resource Mobilization4 June 2026

Those tasks (#11, #12) belong to a different workstream, not mine. I'll skip the task tracking and deliver the memo, which is my actual return value.

Indonesia: Government Actions Needed to Build an Enabling Environment for Industrial EE, Process-Heat Decarbonization, Demand-Side EE, and MRV

Sourced memo. Compiled June 2026. Every non-obvious claim is cited. Where evidence is thin, it is flagged explicitly.

How to read this

Indonesia has the frameworks but not the teeth. The story since the 2022 SETP diagnostic is one of regulatory upgrade (PP 33/2023 replaced the 14-year-old PP 70/2009; ESDM Reg 8/2025 replaced the 2012 energy-management rule; Perpres 110/2025 replaced the 2021 carbon framework) layered on top of the same unresolved enabling-environment failures: no enforcement, no working incentives, no ESCO market, no project-grade finance, cheap subsidized power that kills the business case. The 2022 diagnostic's barriers remain largely live in 2026 because the new regulations re-stated obligations without fixing the cross-ministry delegation, procurement, and budget mechanics that blocked the old ones.

The single most important honest finding: the binding constraints in Indonesia are not "missing laws" but missing implementing rules, missing enforcement, and a subsidized tariff that makes efficiency uneconomic. A GTP enabling-environment program that just helps write another regulation will repeat the failure mode SETP documented.

1. Regulatory framework gaps

Current state. PP 33/2023 (enacted 15 June 2023) is the umbrella energy-conservation regulation; ESDM Reg 8/2025 (in force 13 March 2025) is the operational energy-management rule replacing the 2012 version. crpg.info – PP 33/2023; crpg.info – ESDM 8/2025 Mandatory energy management now applies at lower thresholds: industry/transport ≥4,000 TOE/yr (down from 6,000), buildings ≥500 TOE/yr (down from 1,500), and energy providers ≥6,000 TOE/yr (newly covered). [crpg.info – PP 33/2023]

Gaps.

Government action that closes each gap.

  1. Issue the Ministry of Finance and MEMR implementing regulations that set the quantified penalty schedule and the procedural basis for permit suspension / tariff penalties — without these, the sanction regime is unenforceable, as the 11-year PP 70/2009 record proves. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.27, p.33]
  2. Issue ministry-level conservation regulations at MoI, Public Works, and Transport to operationalize cross-sectoral authority. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.34]
  3. Enact a dedicated ESCO/Energy Savings Performance Contract regulation (the lapsed 14/2016 content) defining the ESCO entity, the ESPC contract, and M&V obligations. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.34, Exhibit A]

2. Energy-efficiency standards (MEPS) and enforcement

Current state. Indonesia has MEPS and labeling for a narrow set: air conditioners (progressive to 2.92 EER after July 2020), refrigerators, rice cookers, fans, and lighting/LEDs. IEA E4 Country Profile – Indonesia; [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.43, p.47] Only ~18% of total energy use was subject to mandatory EE policy as of 2018. [IEA E4 Country Profile]

Gaps.

Government action.

  1. Develop and mandate MEPS + SNI performance standards for industrial motors and boilers (BSN/BRIN to set the standard; MEMR to mandate; Ministry of Trade to enforce at import). [IEA E4 Country Profile; SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.22-24, p.39]
  2. Resource independent test laboratories and a compliance-monitoring microsite (the ADB-built MEPS monitoring system links producers/importers, labs, and certifying LSPs — extend it to industrial equipment). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.47]
  3. Extend mandatory building energy codes beyond large commercial buildings. [IEA E4 Country Profile]

3. ESCO market barriers

Current state. The ESCO market is effectively non-existent: only ~5 known ESCOs operate, most SMEs with limited capital, M&V capability, and access to finance; the trade association (APKENINDO/APPKENINDO) has been dormant ~10 years. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.34] Indonesia is classified globally among countries with "minimal or no ESCO projects." [Global ESCO Network / IEA, via search]

Gaps.

Government action.

  1. Issue an ESCO regulation that recognizes the ESPC contract and mandates IPMVP-based M&V (see §1). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.31, p.34]
  2. Stand up a two-step ESCO accreditation regime (register → certify after delivering a few successful ESPCs), modeled on the Philippines. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.55]
  3. Fund a standardized IGA + M&V capacity-building pipeline and certification track (CEM, CEA, CIGA, CESV). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.45, p.52]
  4. Reorganize the dormant ESCO association into a functioning platform (this is a non-government, fast-win action). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.55]

4. Tariff and incentive design

Current state — the binding economic constraint. Indonesia's electricity is heavily subsidized. Subsidy + compensation exceeded IDR 176–177 trillion (~USD 11bn) in 2024, up 24% YoY. IISD / The Diplomat Customers pay an average ~IDR 1,153/kWh (~USD 0.072) against a true generation cost of ~IDR 1,732/kWh (~USD 0.11). Renewable Energy Laws Report 2026 – Indonesia, ICLG The 2022 diagnostic names "Indonesia's Low Electric Rates" as a unique barrier that "materially reduce[s] EE savings … result[ing] in unacceptably long paybacks and a low internal rate of return." [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.28]

Gaps.

Government action.

  1. Reform/redirect the subsidy so the marginal industrial tariff reflects cost — the only durable fix to the payback problem. (Politically hard; flag as the highest-leverage but slowest action.) [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.28; IISD]
  2. Force MEMR–MoF coordination via a Minister of Finance Regulation that actually delegates and operationalizes the EE tax/duty incentives PP 70/2009 and ESDM 8/2025 promised. Without this MoF delegation, the incentives remain dead letters — explicitly the failure mode of the last 14 years. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.27; crpg.info – ESDM 8/2025]
  3. Design two cash-incentive instruments: a product rebate (offset the price premium of efficient appliances) and a verified-savings payment (cash per actual kWh/thermal reduction, M&V-verified). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.46]

5. MRV standards

Current state. Two parallel MRV regimes matter for GTP:

Gaps.

Government action.

  1. Issue the umbrella + sectoral MRV methodology regulations for industry, harmonizing the energy-reporting (SINERGI/POME) and carbon (SRUK) data systems so a verified energy saving can convert to a tradeable/creditable emission reduction. [Ashurst; crpg.info – ESDM 8/2025]
  2. Embed IPMVP-grade M&V as the national EE measurement protocol (links to §3). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.31]
  3. Sequence a credible mandatory-trading expansion to energy-intensive manufacturing (cement, steel, fertilizer) with real quota-breach consequences and a dated carbon-tax start — otherwise the carbon signal stays absent for the GTP target sectors. [Ashurst]

6. Financing and de-risking

Current state. The 2022 diagnostic found "no commercially-viable EE financing" — not from lack of funds, but from a structural disconnect: local financial institutions apply asset-based corporate lending (lending capped at 70–80% of CAPEX, full collateral) to EE projects whose value is future cash flow, not resaleable equipment. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.31-32] By 2024–25 the de-risking conversation had advanced: an OECD/OJK/MEMR CEFIM workshop (30 May 2024) developed an Energy Savings Insurance (ESI) design for Indonesia, with PT SMI positioned to provide partial credit guarantees and audit/credit-quality grants. OECD CEFIM ESI Workshop Summary, Jan 2025 Indonesia also released the Sustainable Finance Taxonomy (TKBI v1 Feb 2024, v2 Feb 2025) and MoF Reg 103/2023 on fiscal support / blended finance, and BPDLH is developing UNDP-supported de-risking facilities. [SBFN / CPI / UNDP, via search]

Gaps.

Government action.

  1. Establish (and capitalize) the ESI + partial-credit-guarantee architecture via OJK regulation, with PT SMI/BPDLH as the vehicle and a USD 5–10m public/donor first-loss tranche. [OECD CEFIM; SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.55]
  2. Mandate/standardize project-based EE lending guidelines for banks (OJK), with EE-finance training for loan officers (built under UNIDO/GEF and ADB precedents). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.49-50; OECD CEFIM]
  3. Use the Sustainable Finance Taxonomy v2 transition-finance category to make industrial EE/process-heat retrofits explicitly eligible for green/transition credit lines. CPI – Next Phase of Indonesia Green Taxonomy

7. Public procurement

Current state. This is one of the most concrete and tractable gaps. Government agencies cannot legally engage ESCOs on a paid-from-savings basis because of three procurement/budget rules. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.29-30]

Gaps (the "three barriers," shared with PH/TH/VN).

  1. GAs cannot make multi-year savings payments. Perpres 38/2015 allows Availability Payments under PPP over multiple years but does not specify that savings payments count as such. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.29]
  2. GAs cannot retain multi-year savings in their budgets — when an EE project cuts energy cost, the next year's budget allocation is cut accordingly, leaving nothing to repay the investment. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.29-30]
  3. "Lowest-upfront-cost" procurement rule forces purchase of cheaper, less-efficient equipment and demands full spec/cost detail upfront — which only exists after an expensive IGA that no ESCO will perform before being selected. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.30]

Government action.

  1. Revise the PPP regulation (and LKPP procurement rules) so Availability Payments explicitly include savings payments, GAs may retain savings to fund repayment, and a performance-based / two-stage procurement track exists for ESCO projects (the USAID SINAR program drafted the academic justification and solicited/unsolicited PPP-EEP proposal templates for exactly this). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.30, p.39, p.51]
  2. Mandate all government agencies to a quantified energy-reduction target (the diagnostic's proposed "10% by 2025" for GAs) to create demand-side pull. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.51]
  3. Establish green/EE public-procurement specs (LED street-lighting precedent, adopted in MoT Reg 27/2018, is the proof of concept). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.48]

LKPP is the responsible agency for all of this. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.23]

8. Ministry / institutional capacity

Current state. Authority is fragmented across a long list of agencies: MEMR/EBTKE (lead, plus P3TKEBTKE for R&D and PPSDM for HR), MoF (incentives + PPP units PDF/VGF/IIGF), Ministry of Industry (industrial EE targeting), Ministry of Trade (MEPS at border), KLHK/now KLH (PROPER + emissions), Public Works (buildings), Transport (fuel economy), BSN (standards), BRIN (R&D/MEPS), LKPP (procurement), OJK (green finance), DEN (national energy policy), and BPDLH (climate fund channel). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.20-24]

Gaps.

Government action.

  1. Stand up a standing MEMR–MoF–MoI–LKPP coordination mechanism with a mandate to issue the delegated implementing rules (penalties, incentives, procurement) — the missing connective tissue behind every other gap. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.27, p.34]
  2. Resource EBTKE/PPSDM and the market with the CEM/CEA/CIGA/CESV certification pipeline (>50 trainings was the UK PACT-proposed scale). [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.45]
  3. Build and maintain the unified industrial energy database (merge MEMR/MoI/BPS, integrate with SINERGI/POME) to make targeting, benchmarking, and MRV possible. [SETP Diagnostic 2022, p.40]
  4. Give the Ministry of Industry's Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap regulatory force: a Technical Report (Sept 2025) and Policy Report (March 2026) are due, with staged per-subsector Ministerial Regulations targeted by Sept 2026 across the 9 energy-intensive subsectors (cement, iron & steel, fertilizers, chemicals, pulp & paper, textiles, glass & ceramics, automotive, food & beverage = 36% of industrial emissions; USD 260bn investment to 2050). IESR – Net-Zero Industry Roadmap 2050 Watch item: verify whether these dates have slipped, since the roadmap regulation is the main forward vehicle for binding sectoral EE/process-heat targets.

Process-heat decarbonization — the thinnest evidence area (flagged)

Public, Indonesia-specific policy on industrial process-heat decarbonization is genuinely thin and I will not over-claim it. What is documented:

Honest gap: I found no dedicated Indonesian regulation or incentive specifically for fuel-switching of industrial process heat (e.g., coal/gas boiler → biomass/electric/heat-pump), and the subsidized-tariff problem (§4) actively works against heat electrification because cheap-but-still-fossil grid power and the absence of a meaningful carbon price remove the switching incentive. The needed government actions are therefore the cross-cutting ones above (boiler MEPS, carbon price for industry, tariff reform, transition-finance eligibility) rather than a standalone process-heat instrument that does not yet exist. I did not invent a program to fill this gap.

What I could not verify / data caveats

Primary sources

← back to work